The Ninth Sunday after Pentecost/July 29, 2012
The Very Reverend E. Clifford Cutler
"I pray that, according to the riches of his glory, he may grant that you may be strengthened in your inner being with power..."
The
scriptures today remind us of our human weakness and God’s strength, our human
ailing and God’s holiness, our hunger and God’s provision, our fear and God’s
comfort. This is important to have in
mind as we examine our shrinking church whose decline many have laid at the
feet of liberalism.
Let’s begin
with the numbers. There is no disputing
them. When I graduated from high school
in 1967 there were about 3 ½ million members in the Episcopal Church. Now 45 years later there are less than 2
million, the fewest members since 1935. 1. Saint Paul’s had an average attendance of
over 450 in 1967 which today is a bit over 200.
In 1971 when I graduated from college and chose to respond to God’s call
to ordination, 40% of the clergy under age 40 had seriously considered leaving
the ministry. Nothing changed more
dramatically during the 60s than American religion.2. This was the church that I was sent to serve.
It has come in for some harsh
criticism, much of which was cynical but there were some critiques that deserve
our serious consideration; hence this sermon.
The Wall Street Journal in an
article entitled, “What Ails the Episcopalians, “referred to the legal
wrangling over property, and criticized what it saw as a focus on secular
politics. Two days later, The New York Times ran an op-ed piece
that wondered “Can Liberal Christianity Be Saved?” Here the critique was of a church that
changed and changed some more. Again
there was the reference to a downplay of theology in favor of secular
politics. Finally, last week in our
local paper a Mt. Airy poet prayed, “Protect me from all religion,” by which
she means absolutism in all its forms.
These are honest criticisms about which there is no need to be
defensive, but every need for reflection and a considered response.
Liberal Christianity has to do with
freedom – the freedom to interpret scripture and to adapt traditions to
particular cultural and social settings.
There is much that is helpful in this liberal stance and also there are
dangers. The Times article identified one of these dangers as a church that
changes then changes again. Our modern
culture today is equally fluid. In this
situation it is possible for liberal Christianity to become so free in its
interpretations and adaptations that it loses it mooring. When this happens we members feel disoriented
and anxious. A corrective is the
Benedictine influence within our Episcopal Church, particularly its insistence
on stability. Our prayer at the end of
Lent for instance is that “our hearts may surely there be fixed where true joys
are to be found,” that is in the presence of God. In addition, our worship includes ancient
elements such as the Sanctus that our worship sheet describes as dating back to
the 4th century. This gives a
rootedness for a people whose society and whose church seems to change and then
change again.
The 60s represented a huge shock to
religion. The church feared the loss of
confidence in institutions and social and moral upheaval. The evangelical response was to take a strong
stand for faith with a zeal that kept their numbers high. By 1979 when the Episcopal Church’s new
prayer book was published, the Moral Majority formed, linking religion and
politics. Ten years later the group
disbanded but conservative political partisanship and high church attendance
seemed to go hand in hand. But by the
1990s the evangelical boom that began in the 70s was over. The important lesson in this is not which
secular politics a church chooses but its passionate intensity 3.
(evident in many evangelical churches) for God’s work of mending, unity and
reconciliation. In fact, the politics
are a cautionary tale.
Robert Putnam and David Campbell’s
book American Grace: How Religion Divides
and Unites Us documented a second aftershock from the turbulent 60s,
following the first reaction of the Religious Right. By the 1990s increasing numbers of Americans
became troubled by the role of religion in politics. Young Americans saw religion as judgmental,
homophobic, too political and turned away. 4. There was little distinction between highly
visible conservative religious leaders and religion in general; notwithstanding
the reality that there is very little politicking from American pulpits. Instead, one finds a transcendent quality to
Christianity that goes beyond any party.
“Our citizenship is in heaven,” Paul says to the Philippians (3:20). Yes, there is a call to do God’s will (the
wellbeing of all) on earth, but not to reduce God’s will to what is on earth. Meanwhile the church has lost a generation of
young people.
The
Wall Street Journal article referred to the legal wrangling over property
in the church and the litigation by parishes that have sought to leave the
Episcopal Church. Setting aside the
rights of the institution that the courts have regularly upheld, we need to
find a way of disagreeing in the church with grace. Whether it is in a local congregation or on
the national scene we are too quick to go on the offensive and square off. We think we have God on our side. The fact is that God shows no partiality
(Acts 10:34). Each person is worth our
attention, none our disdain. It is about
grace.
In The Chestnut Hill Local, the author like many identifies religion
with absolutism. In an awkward twist to
Edmund Burke’s famous quote she writes: “In order for good people to do hideous
things, you need religion.” In other
words if you wrap yourself in God you can do anything – protect abusers of
children whether in church or university.
This is a difficult and important criticism to listen to. Mary’s song that we call the Magnificat is a
truer statement of faith. God has
showed “strength with his arm; he hath scattered the proud in the imagination
of their hearts. He hath put
down the mighty from their seats, and exalted them of low degree.” Those who presume to be absolute even in the
name of religion are put down.
So what is there to learn
that might save liberal Christianity or cure what ails the Episcopal
Church? First there can be no change
without stability. We need to be
grounded in our worship where the ancient and the contemporary are brought
together. Then we can reach out to bring
transformation and change. Second, it’s
not the politics, it’s the passion that gives growth. What is there to be passionate about? I am passionate about the way of Jesus in a
world where so much is false and unclear.
I am passionate about experiencing community. I am passionate about praise whose purpose is
to create a world unblemished by violence.
I am passionate about the life satisfaction that comes from religion.
5. Let’s be full of passionate
intensity. We need to pay attention to
our young people. They are looking for a
church that is inclusive, compassionate and not partisan, that honors wonder
and mystery. Our baptisms today remind
us that we are to do all in our power to support children in their life in
Christ. We cannot afford to lose another
generation. Fourth, our Episcopal
tradition of comprehensiveness means that we are going to be in community with
people who think differently than we do.
God’s truth is greater than any one perspective. We sing, “the love of God is broader than the
measure of the mind” (Hymn 470). When we
disagree we do so with grace. Finally,
the Benedictine quality of humility is another gift from our tradition. We do not impose, we engage. We do not coerce, we network and learn from
one another. Because we humbly
acknowledge our humanness there is no necessity for pretensions and
cover-ups. These lessons are what give
me cause for optimism though the way is long and far from certain. We have reliable gifts that sustain us. And most of all we have God who day by day
strengthens our inner being with power.
So says the Letter to the Ephesians.
Amen.
1. Zscheile,
Dwight J.; People of the Way: Renewing
Episcopal Identity; New York:
Morehouse Publishing, 2012; p. xiv.
2. Putnam,
Robert D. and Campbell, David E.; American
Grace: How Religion Divides and
Unites Us; New York: Simon & Schuster, 2010; p.
94-95.
3. Ibid., p. 107
4. Ibid., p. 121, 130-1.
5. Ibid., p. 491
<< Home